Aristo - you must have seen this conversation many times in auto guide.com's stable of forums. Do you have an example of one that has been implemented particularly well?
foleydb - I absolutely take your point about knowledge base best practice, but in my experience (mostly motorcycle) forums are just too chaotic. However careful you are with keywords and metadata, you can spend hours trying to diagnose a problem by reading through a mass of old, incorrect, speculative, superceeded information spread over many threads to get at the nuggets. Or you give up and just start a new thread, further overloading the next searcher. Not problem here yet perhaps, but with time, growth and endless careless postings, it inevitably will be.
I guess a thread is a conversation after all, so it's never going to be structured. And that's what's great about these forums (we wouldn't want it to be like stackoverflow.com...). But I think the active threads and the indexes should be together.
What we seem to have here is a resource with the technical knowledge and ability to separate the wheat from the chaff (ie jamiealfa) volunteering to maintain an index of the "best bits" to save us a load of time.
So for me, it's:
Yes, to sub folders (whatever the mods are happy with), replacing existing technical sub folders.
Yes, to a sticky "Index - the best bits" at the top of each sub folder, for "adopted threads" and external links (there would probably have to be some rules).
No, to sub, sub folders. Getting too complicated.
Everyone is free to post to all threads.
When an interesting thread is started about a new issue it can get "adopted" for the index (marked as such in the listing) and becomes the reference for this topic and (this is the real magic for me..) the OP is obligated, where relevant, to maintain their original post with developments as they evolve. OK, the last bit is somewhat naive, but if the OP doesn't, or doesn't feel qualified to do this, then the maintainer(s) of the index can step in (Aristo - can a post be inserted at the top of a thread? If not, can the Index Maintainer(s) started a new thread and merge the old thread underneath? Or
just have permissions to edit the OP?).
That just leaves the investment in the existing technical threads which need moving.
So, jamiealfa, would your largese extend to doing the OP editing where necessary and moving the existing threads (if mods allowed temp permissions). It's a big ask. But if you don't ask, you don't get!